Home
friends [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
lightelation

[ website | Flickr ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

[Jul. 4th, 2008|09:59 pm]

aiko273

I did this a few weeks ago in our garage. I was only really testing the lighting; the garage is nicely creepy so I'll probably use it for a "proper" idea in the future.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic





I think I've decided what colour I'm going to go with my hair, I'm going to go back to COLOUR. Eye-blasting colour, hopefully. But I won't say what, because most of the time I get lazy and don't go through with whatever I'm going to do.

However, I am going to reminisce on past hair colours now. And how awful my makeup was.


Image and video hosting by TinyPic

It is a blatant rule that if you are into visual kei, you must, at some point have white somewhere in your hair.
This was pretty cool, shame about the cut... and everything else. Also sucked that it disappeared almost straight away. I think this was one of the few dyejobs my hairdresser did for me, most of the rest I did myself (and most of the time you can tell).
_______ )
Link13 comments|Leave a comment

[Jul. 4th, 2008|08:49 pm]

aiko273

Looks like rain, Ted.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

And it did... all... day.

But we did find the most amazing milkshake shop. They could make a milkshake out of pretty much any of your favourite sweets/chocolate. I had Flying Saucers with popping candy topping.

I cannot fucking wait for the Big Brother eviction tonight. We have already scoured the Internet looking at the betting odds and it is pretty obvious that everyone else hates Jennifer as much as we do. Damn, it is going to be amazing. I hope she cries. It is, of course, all she is good at.
LinkLeave a comment

Not Exactly New [Jul. 5th, 2008|12:00 am]

visual_fuckers

[earnestinberlin]
[Current Mood | geeky]
[Current Music |Kiyoharu- Bouncy]

I actually have been here for a long time... Hm... But I never did bother to do anything, so since I feel like it...

RED TEDDY BEAR )
Link11 comments|Leave a comment

[a]narchy online sale [Jul. 4th, 2008|06:31 pm]

visual_fuckers

[kayteanese]
i hope this is allowed, but my salon has been working with a lot of japanese visual/cyber artists who generally end up having imitators getting fucked elsewhere...so we thought we would extend the offer to those interested from the source, to avoid getting fucked ^_~

as our way of saying thanks to everyone who has supported [a]narchy over the last three years, we've put our hairpieces online to buy for the first time, and also marked the prices down :D

for anyone interested, the sale can be found here:

http://www.anarchyinthejp.com/blog/uncategorized/anarchy-sale.html#more-32
LinkLeave a comment

Lichtenstein House: High Museum in Atlanta [Jul. 4th, 2008|03:37 am]

girlyunderwear
( You are about to view content that may not be appropriate for minors. )
Link2 comments|Leave a comment

Japanese fashion on ebay! [Jul. 4th, 2008|02:01 pm]

visual_fuckers

[airina9]
Photobucket
Link2 comments|Leave a comment

Cartoon: Penultimate Wedding Montage [Jul. 3rd, 2008|12:00 am]
achewood
Achewood strip for Thursday, July 3, 2008
LinkLeave a comment

Ideology is alive and well and living in syntax [Jul. 4th, 2008|07:50 am]

imomus
We're often told we live in an age where grand narratives and ideologies are dead. This is rubbish; ideology is all around us. But it's mostly our own ideology. What's dead -- or at least endangered -- is alternative ideology and narratives, those consistent and clear ideas which challenge our way of thinking.

If you want to find ideology, just read any piece of journalism. Pay particular attention to the sense, the semantics, the syntax, and what it implies. You'll soon come up against words like "but", "however", "despite", "even though" and "paradoxically", words which tell you how to read the relationships being described in the piece.

Last month I was reading a piece in the Times of India. Entitled Poor India makes millionaires at fastest pace, the article -- datelined Washington -- said that "Despite having the world's largest population of poor people living on less than a dollar a day, India created millionaires at the fastest pace in the world in 2007... India, with the world's largest population of poor people living on less than a dollar a day, also paradoxically created millionaires at the fastest pace in the world in 2007 even though the world grew such "high net worth individuals (HNWIs)" at the slowest pace in four years... In contrast, developmental agencies put the number of subsistence level Indians living on less than a dollar a day at 350 million and those living on less than $ 2 a day at 700 million. In other words, for every millionaire, India has about 7000 impoverished people."

Now, despite, paradoxically and in contrast to the syntax of this article, I would argue that nothing is more natural than that millionaires and poor people co-exist, and that there is an intimate relationship between them. Furthermore, we could argue that the speed at which HNWI are created probably matches the speed at which LNWI are created. Follow the money: where is the rich people's money coming from?

But because Marxism "has been discredited", people have no useful way to account for this relationship. The result is this absurd "it's a mystery why these completely unrelated phenomena are happening simultaneously" phraseology. Only the headline "Poor India makes millionaires" suggests a direct, causal relationship between the poor and the rich. Everything else in the article is skewed to present this as a mysterious paradox, something counter-intuitive. The implication is clearly that millionaires trickle down wealth through the whole population, and that the emergence of millionaires ought to co-incide with everyone getting richer.

Here's another example of ideology masquerading, by using presumptuous syntax, as common sense. This is conservative art critic Brian Sewell on Big Brother, upbraiding contestant Amy, an artist, for the conceptual nature of her work:



"I just wonder where art comes into it," says Sewell, looking at Amy's photographs. "If you showed this photo of a filthy sink to Michaelangelo and said it was art, would he believe you?"

"Perhaps he wouldn't," Amy replies, "but art, to me, is born out of the social context of the period in which you're living."

"This, to me, is the trouble with contemporary art," says Sewell, getting to the nub of his ideology. "It is all about an idea which may or may not make sense. Art must surely be the most direct form of communication, a straightforward pictorial or sculptural "something", whereas yours requires a program to elucidate it. And so I don't understand why you distance yourself from the public that might be interested in art."

The ideology here is really all packed into the "whereas". Sewell's idea of art is of something "direct and straightforward", in other words non-ideological. Whereas the conceptual art he dislikes requires a conceptual apparatus, an instruction manual, an art education, an ideology, to make sense, the "pictorial or sculptural" art he endorses apparently doesn't. Sewell's problem -- his basic philosophical error -- is that he doesn't see that Michaelangelo's work also requires those things; that it needs to be understood within the highly ideological program of Michaelangelo's main patron, the Catholic church, as well as within all sorts of visual conventions like the conventions of perspective.

Sewell's syntax -- his whereas -- is therefore completely spurious. He also fails to see that today's public may well be better plugged into the post-1900 conventions Amy's working within than the 16th century ones Michaelangelo was. Amy understands art's dependence on social context, Sewell doesn't. He wants to present art from an alien and remote social context as "timeless" and "natural" and "direct". But this, in itself, is the most noxious ideology of all: the ideology that fails to see itself as ideology, fails to nail its colours to the mast, and presents itself in the form of the syntax of "common sense" rather than the program of presuppositions, presumptions and personal beliefs it actually is.
Link24 comments|Leave a comment

#977 [Jul. 3rd, 2008|08:23 pm]
boasas

Boy on a Stick and Slither

Please visit BOASAS.COM

LinkLeave a comment

[Jul. 3rd, 2008|11:50 pm]

aiko273

The first week of our holiday has been good. Relaxing. I read a Terry Pratchett book in two days, and I've started "Misery" by King. A good relax is a good book.

The drive down only took 7 hours. That is right, I said only. As in, it can and has taken much longer, possibly even double.

The weather has been okay, considering we are still in England (quick geography lesson, we are currently in the bit of England that sticks out on the bottom left. No, not Wales). Cornwall can be hot, but it can also be unpredictable. The prediction is a whole weekend of rain. I've been trying to get a natural tan, but it is kind of hard when its boiling one minute and cloudy the next.

And Adam has got a tattoo. My parents said I should have put my foot down. If I had put it down any further I'd be through the floor. Ha. Ha. Ha.
Without going into a huge rant, I personally don't like tattoos. I just don't understand the fascination (and please don't fucking try to explain it). But previously my thoughts on the subject were that I don't care what other people do as long as I am not tattooed. Now I realise my thoughts on the subject were that I don't care what other people do as long as I NOR MY FIANCE are tattooed. I probably wouldn't have minded so much if it was somewhere "hidden".

It's on the fucking back of his neck.

It is a puzzle piece. Want to know what it symbolizes? I don't think you do, you will probably want to throw up, so I'll just leave it as: it symbolizes me. Well it won't fucking symbolize me whenever we get married, I'm telling you that. If it isn't covered by his shirt collar it will be by makeup, which he will have to get used to considering he wants to be an actor. I don't know much on this subject and I'd rather not know until he finds out the possible hard way but, we heard rumours that a tattoo in the wrong place could be the thing that stops an aspiring actor getting a job. However, after researching for HOURS (which consisted purely of going into MAC and asking if there is a makeup that covers tattoos) on this vital piece of information that could pretty much fuck up everything, he decided to do it anyway.

You may think this whole thing is sweet. Do I look like the type of person that swoons over such acts of love? If he wanted to impress me (which he probably didn't, he probably wanted to piss me off, and wants to get another one mainly just to piss me off) he could have saved that 20 quid and put it towards... NUMEROUS ways of showing how I am the "missing piece to his puzzle". Such as a lovely necklace.

That was a rant, sorry, but it is pretty difficult calmly whining at him about it when I just want to scream and swear. I don't think he even realises how much it has bothered me. But there wouldn't be any point in showing him since it cannot be undone. I just have to see it every time I hug him. Maybe he will meet me at the halfway mark and grow his hair over it. Wait, what do I mean maybe? He WILL do it.

Enough of this, how about something nice to look at?

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
Need any other reason why we come back every year?
Mousehole )
Link20 comments|Leave a comment

[Jul. 3rd, 2008|09:30 pm]

aiko273

Still on holiday, it's been great.

How am I updating? The owners of the cottage we rent put in a wireless internet system.

It seems odd, because I usually think of Cornwall as not keeping up "with the times", but this place obviously has. I also rather they hadn't because, well, I was dreading checking my email (full of crap) when I came back anyway, and I'm dreading doing it now. But it is here so I have to do it.

I also miss my house and my housemates.
Link7 comments|Leave a comment

и Ленин великий нам путь озарил [Jul. 3rd, 2008|12:25 am]

art_apocalypse

[holy_smart_alex]
[Tags|]
[Current Music |Муслим Магомаев]



via [info]vintagephoto
Link1 comment|Leave a comment

Michele Clement [Jul. 3rd, 2008|05:09 pm]

art_apocalypse

[yogsagot]


Via [info]adski_kafeteri
LinkLeave a comment

[Jul. 3rd, 2008|04:55 am]

flyingcircles
LinkLeave a comment

[Jul. 3rd, 2008|07:20 am]

pictography

[autumn_lull]
Link4 comments|Leave a comment

Cartoon: Closing in on Love. [Jul. 2nd, 2008|12:00 am]
achewood
Achewood strip for Wednesday, July 2, 2008
LinkLeave a comment

Jesus fucking Christ [Jul. 3rd, 2008|02:07 am]

gaburieru_
[Current Mood |wow omfg]

I didn't submit this single stupid form at stupid International Jeebus University, and now they probably aren't going to submit my grades to UCLA. Ergo, the past year of my life, officially, might've been wasted.

Heavy sigh. I didn't do a stellar job over there, and ICU was a terrible excuse for a university, so most of the classes I took were probably worthless. But so what? I need to graduate from college so that I can get a job. I don't know what the FUCK I'm going to do if I have to spend another year in college to graduate. I don't know how I'm going to pay for it, I don't know how I'm going to stand it...I just won't fucking know anything about anything if this shit happens.
LinkLeave a comment

Flickr and Disco [Jul. 3rd, 2008|10:23 am]

imomus
What does it mean to art-direct your own life? I don't know, all I know is that it's a hell of a lot of work captioning and rotating something like a thousand photographs (it felt like a thousand, anyway) documenting the last month of your life. Not the last month, I mean, just the latest one. The past month. Argh, words! Anyway, to see my selections from the thousands of digital images I've snapped in various locations over the past month, go to my Flickr page or load up the slideshow.

Meanwhile, if you understand Spanish you can read the first of a new monthly series of music columns I'm writing for Playground, a new Spanish webzine. Con el disco, como con la música Disco means "As with Disco, so with the disk", and it's a piece about how records, as physical objects, are going underground now, just as Disco did at the end of the 70s.



Since the piece appears on the site only in Spanish, I'll provide an English translation here. But before I do, a reminder that I play the Faraday Stolichnaya Festival at Vilanova i la Geltrú (approximately midway between Barcelona and Valencia) tomorrow night.

AS WITH DISCO, SO WITH THE DISK

The official story of Disco sees the genre spinning through a cycle:

1. Disco starts life as something almost secret -- the party music of urban American black and gay subcultures.

2. Disco goes overground thanks to the success of Donna Summer and the Saturday Night Fever soundtrack.

3. Disco experiences over-exposure, burn-out and backlash.

4. Disco returns to the same underground subculture it emerged from.

5. Disco reappears, a few years later, in the form of Detroit and Chicago house music.

Most commentators see the underground and overground parts of this story as a sort of dialectic, each as necessary as the other. Disco's marginality, before and after its mainstream success, gave the genre a kind of laboratory in which to concoct the startling originality we hear both in Donna Summer's first hits and, ten years later, in Kevin Saunderson's. Commercial failure, then, doesn't have to be -- in the words of those infuriating falsetto Bee Gees -- "tragedy". Like crop rotation, it's part of a fruitful cycle.

The story of Disco has become the story of the disk -- that is, of the plastic-oriented music industry itself. The internet has made selling mainstream music in physical formats, and enforcing copyright, unprofitable. As a result, major parts of the record industry are doing what Disco did at the end of the 70s: going back underground, back to the lab. Far from dying, pop music is going underground, entering a period of exciting experimentation.



What is undoubtedly dying is the landscape of 20th century pop music. Almost all the seemingly-megalithic, seemingly-immortal institutions of commercial pop music -- as I knew them as a British person growing up in the last century -- have vanished. There's no more Top of the Pops, the TV chart show that dominated my childhood. All but one of the British weekly music papers have disappeared. John Peel died and wasn't replaced. Huge retail chains like Tower and Virgin shut up shop. Richard Branson sold his British and American Virgin stores, and this month it was announced that the two New York Virgin Megastores would close.

As for the record labels, those 80s icons Prince and Madonna know which way the wind is blowing. Prince released his last album, Planet Earth, as a free CD on the cover of a newspaper. But giving the plastic disk away wasn't a sign that Prince's career was over; far from it. He immediately sold out 21 nights at London's 02 Arena. Madonna's last record deal wasn't just a record deal -- it included slices of her concert and merchandising revenue too. As a recording and performing musician myself, I know it very well: live shows used to be ways to promote records, but now it's the other way around.

One reason concerts are alive and records are dead is that there's a new value in things which can't be uploaded as digital content to the internet. I call this phenomenon "the post-bit atom". It also explains why the art market is booming. Art and music have become social occasions. An art opening or a concert (or, even better, an art opening with a concert included) is a chance for people who spend all day in front of computer screens to see their fellow human beings and share an intense, loud, colourful, real experience with them.

Art and music are also "distinction machines": efficient ways for people to sum up complex clusters of values -- social, political, aesthetic and ethical -- and connect with like-minded souls. None of this is going to become less important any time soon.



Like Disco at the end of the 70s, the disk is going underground. Where it does survive, music on plastic is elliptical, obscure, artisanal. We all thought they would go out of business first, but it's the little shops which are surviving. On New York's East 4th Street, Tower Records used to tower over specialist independent shop Other Music. It's the indie store which has survived; the gigantic Tower fell two years ago. In London, the Virgin Megastore may have disappeared, but funky little indie Rough Trade is flourishing: last year it opened Rough Trade East on fashionable Truman's Yard, and this year the new store won the British High Street Retailer of the Year Award. Which is extremely ironic, considering that Rough Trade has always been the very opposite of "high street".

Disks now survive as a kind of underground art form in their own right: limited edition box sets of high-quality 7-inch vinyl with hand-painted sleeves, fetishistic souvenirs of a vanished age of mechanical reproduction. If they ever do return to the mainstream, the way Disco did in the late 80s, it'll be due to some radical reinvention, some apocalypse. Perhaps electricity will become incredibly expensive, and the wind-up gramophone will return. Perhaps it'll emerge that iPods and too-loud live shows have made a whole generation deaf, and perhaps atavistic copyright lawyers and legislators will succeed in banning online music distribution completely. Yes, and perhaps pigs will fly.

We should probably just accept that the disk -- though certainly not music -- is underground forever now, dead and buried. Let's dance on its rotating plastic grave! Wearing lab coats!
Link23 comments|Leave a comment

Subletter Needed for Session C!! [Jul. 3rd, 2008|12:13 am]
ucla
[bizzybees]
I am looking for one female to sublet during UCLA's session C (Aug. 2nd to Sept. 14th) in a two-bedroom, fully-furnished apartment in a quiet building on Kelton Ave.

You would be sharing a room with one other girl. Cable television, internet, washer/dryer, desk and bed are all provided! The rooms are large, the building tenants are quiet, and all-around it's a great place to stay.

The cost is $575 for August, and half of that amount for September ($287.50), plus utilities.

Please comment if you're interested, or call me at (310) 561-9217. Thank you!
LinkLeave a comment

Could I work for the Onion? [Jul. 3rd, 2008|02:17 am]

girlyunderwear
( You are about to view content that may not be appropriate for minors. )
Link14 comments|Leave a comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]